IPO vs FPO: Reading the Real Signals Behind Capital Raising
- Bhanu Kiran
- Oct 17
- 5 min read
When a company needs capital, it can enter the market through an IPO or raise additional funds through an FPO. Both involve selling shares to the public, yet they reflect different stages of financial strategy. An IPO signals entry and valuation discovery, while an FPO shows expansion or restructuring within an established business. Understanding this distinction helps investors assess where a company stands in its growth cycle and how its capital decisions may influence long-term value.
Why Companies Choose IPO Or FPO To Raise Capital
Purpose of an IPO
Companies launch an Initial Public Offering (IPO) to raise funds for business expansion, debt repayment, or partial exit of early investors. The IPO marks the company’s first step into public markets by allowing it to convert private ownership into tradable equity. Beyond capital access, listing also helps improve governance standards and brand credibility in the eyes of institutional investors.
Purpose of an FPO
A Follow-on Public Offering (FPO) is used by companies already listed on the exchange to raise additional capital for growth, comply with SEBI’s 25% Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) rule, or reduce promoter holdings. FPOs are often used to realign ownership and improve liquidity in the market.
IPO vs FPO: Core Differences Investors Should Understand
The distinction between an IPO and an FPO defines how investors approach opportunity and valuation in listed markets. Each represents a different stage of a company’s financial evolution, influencing pricing, disclosure depth, and risk visibility.
Stage of the Company
An IPO is a company’s first listing on the stock exchange. It marks the shift from private to public ownership and introduces the business to market pricing and investor scrutiny.
An FPO occurs when a listed company issues more shares after operating publicly for some time. It reflects a mature phase where the firm seeks additional funding to expand or rebalance ownership.
Purpose of Fundraising
Funds raised through an IPO are typically used for growth, acquisitions, or debt reduction. It enables the company to scale while building credibility in the capital market.
An FPO is issued mainly to raise extra equity, meet SEBI’s 25% minimum public shareholding rule, or reduce promoter concentration. It helps strengthen financial structure without changing the company’s core direction.
Pricing and Valuation Process
In an IPO, the price band is set through a book-building process that gauges investor demand and compares industry valuations. The final price reflects market discovery.
An FPO is often priced below the prevailing market level to draw wider participation. The valuation depends more on the company’s financial history than market sentiment.
Risk, Transparency, and Investor Confidence
IPOs carry higher uncertainty since investors rely on disclosures in the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) and have no trading record to reference.
FPOs present lower risk because the company’s financials, results, and compliance record are already available to the public. Investors can assess credibility using historical data.
Impact on Existing Shareholders and Dilution
An IPO always dilutes ownership as new investors enter and existing holders offload part of their stake.
In an FPO, dilution varies. A dilutive FPO adds new shares and reduces ownership percentage, while a non-dilutive FPO involves only the transfer of existing shares.
Regulatory Process and Market Perception
An IPO involves SEBI's vetting of the DRHP under the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018. It is treated as a company’s formal entry into the listed market.
An FPO follows the same regulatory framework, but the review process is typically smoother since the issuer already complies with listing and reporting norms. It is viewed as a continuation of market participation rather than a new debut.
When IPOs Make Sense vs When FPOs Do For an Investor
The suitability of an IPO or FPO depends on an investor’s risk appetite, return horizon, and familiarity with the issuer. Both serve distinct roles in portfolio strategy. One offers early-stage entry into growth stories, the other allows participation in proven businesses with known fundamentals.
When IPOs Make Sense
Best suited for investors seeking early access to potential high-growth companies.
Offers long-term upside if the business model sustains post-listing performance.
Requires tolerance for price volatility, as valuations adjust after trading begins.
Favored by Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) for exposure to new sectors and allocation diversity, even in uncertain markets.
When FPOs Make Sense
Appropriate for investors who prefer companies with an established operating record.
Provides transparency through audited financials and consistent disclosure history.
Often comes with discounted pricing relative to the current market rate, improving entry value.
Useful for value-oriented investors seeking participation in credible, regulated issuers.
In 2025, only 15% of new IPOs gained more than 25% on listing, down from 41% in 2024. Around 38% of issues continue to trade below their offer price, showing how price discovery has become harder even in strong market conditions.
These results highlight the need for selectivity in the primary market. Investors should first understand why the company is raising capital, whether to fund growth or to meet compliance requirements, and then assess whether the valuation aligns with performance history. In that context, the choice between IPO and FPO reflects the broader trade-off between taking early-stage uncertainty and backing a business with visible fundamentals.
Before we conclude the blog, let us invite you for a 1:1 financial planning session.
Conclusion
An IPO or FPO is not just a funding event; it’s a statement of where a company stands in its financial journey. IPOs test market belief in an unproven story, while FPOs measure continued confidence in a known one. For investors, the practical skill lies in reading the intent behind the issue—whether it’s growth-driven, compliance-driven, or balance-sheet repair. Understanding that motive often tells more about the company’s direction than the offer price itself.
FAQs
Which is better, IPO or FPO?
An IPO suits investors seeking early entry into high-growth companies with higher risk and volatility. An FPO is better for those who prefer stable, established businesses with transparent performance and discounted pricing.
What is the difference between IPO, FPO, and OFS?
An IPO is the first public issue of shares by a company. An FPO is an additional issue by a listed company, while an Offer for Sale (OFS) involves promoters or major shareholders selling existing shares without creating new equity.
Does FPO increase share prices?
An FPO is often priced below the current market value to attract buyers. This can temporarily reduce share prices, but they may recover if the raised funds strengthen business performance.
What is the difference between IPO, FPO, and NFO?
An IPO is a company’s debut share sale to the public. An FPO is a subsequent share issue by an already listed company, while an NFO is the first offering of units by a mutual fund, not company stock.
Comments